香港新浪網 MySinaBlog
« 上一篇 | 下一篇 »
Henry | 28th Oct 2006 | 胡說八道 | (715 Reads)

平均分: 10.00 | 評分人數: 1
突然因為亨利妹妹的白痴事, 和她在爭吵著一個問題. 但因為我們都不能conclude 答案, 所以決定post 出來大家討論一下:

問大家一個簡單的問題:

A 君身家只得 $10, 佢打算捐 $5 俾人.
B 君身家有 $1000, 佢都打算捐 $5 俾人.

你覺得誰人比較慷慨?

又如果:

A 君身家只得 $10, 佢打算捐 $5 俾人.
B 君身家有一千萬, 佢都打算捐五百萬俾人.

你又覺得誰比較慷慨?

就如大家所見, 答案無對錯, 只是想看看大家意見. 請"慷慨"留言. :)


[1]

問大家一個簡單的問題:

A 君身家只得 $10, 佢打算捐 $5 俾人.
B 君身家有 $1000, 佢都打算捐 $5 俾人.

ans:a

你覺得誰人比較慷慨?

又如果:

A 君身家只得 $10, 佢打算捐 $5 俾人.
B 君身家有一千萬, 佢都打算捐五百萬俾人.

大家一讓較慷,沒有分別,因為都是身家的50%


[引用] | 作者 Totoro | 28th Oct 2006 | [舉報垃圾留言]

[2]

我同意 Totoro 的答案,我看不到有什麼困難。

你們又在攪什麼??


[引用] | 作者 =^.^= | 29th Oct 2006 | [舉報垃圾留言]

[3]

check this article out, http://www.motherjones.com/news/exhibit/2006/05/perks_of_privilege.html

In the article it said,
"BUSH’S TAX CUTS GIVE a 2-child family earning $1 million an extra $86,722—or Harvard tuition, room, board, and an iMac G5 for both kids.

A 2-CHILD family earning $50,000 gets $2,050—or 1/5 the cost of public college for one kid."

The rich family get 8% tax cut, where as the normal family get 4% tax cut. Even the rich family get 4% tax cut, they will still have more than $40,000 extra money.

Same case, if B has 10 millions and donate 5 millions. I am sure B can still maintain his/her standard of living without any problem. However, if A only has $10 and donate $5, his/her miserable life will become more miserable.

Also put into account that how much tax deduction you can get for 5 millions donations. The rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer. I don't know if this is fair or not.


[引用] | 作者 Jerome | 29th Oct 2006 | [舉報垃圾留言]

[4]

其實我同意jerome 的說法.

雖然都是50% 身家, 但A 君只有$5 剩下. 生活只會更難. 但B 君還會有五百萬. 他的生活不會變得很慘...


[引用] | 作者 外星人 | 29th Oct 2006 | [舉報垃圾留言]

[5]

the answers depends on what kind of premise you will put ahead before you conclude.
"individually", both two questions, i will choose A because A has little money than B, but A still willing to devote half of his or her asset out to others.; however, "in the social point of view" i will choose B because B devote the social utility more than A. that means B alone can devote more welfare to society then A alone. in a word. A devote less to society than B, but A devotes more than B relative his or her total assets,equivalently to say B devotes less than A relative his or her total assets.从物理角度来说, 答案取决于参照物。如果把整个社会的福利作为参照物,当然选B.因为B贡献给社会的福利更多。但是如果以个人财产为参照物, 显然,A 贡献的更多。


[引用] | 作者 yaoguai | 10th Nov 2006 | [舉報垃圾留言]

[6]

路過的...小小感覺...

我覺得A及B同樣捐$5既情況下,大家是同等慷慨...

為何我們對任何事情也要求平等的情況下,對捐款者反而不平等?難道李嘉誠有日有機會在街買旗,便要將該組織整日賣的旗也買下嗎?


[引用] | 作者 JOE‧C | 27th Nov 2006 | [舉報垃圾留言]